From the office of James Welsh
July 1st 2021
The preliminary report is provided by the Office of the author of Corroborating Evidence
in response to the provision in Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the Intelligence
Authorization Act (IAA) for Fiscal Year 2021, that the DNI, in consultation with the Secretary of
Defense (SECDEF), is to submit an intelligence assessment on the human misconception that UAPs represent some sort of threat posed by unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the progress this individual has submitted his report which hands down beats the Batman balloon chasing efforts of the Department of Defense Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) Welsh has has been promised that humanities understanding this UAP issue is incorrect and they are NOT A THREAT. The nature of man is to fear. Do not fear. Fear is counter productive. Fear needs removed. Recognition of their existence must become universally accepted phenomena here on earth before any exchange of cultures can bind us closer. STOP
There is no threat. That is the first misconception humans have incorrectly concluded. The policy makers must be removed from this equation. They are NOT the policy makers. The people of earth can decide if they wish to close themselves off from the universe and it is not the decision or right of the policy makers to decide if we are enlightened or not. The UAP ‘problem’ will remain a ‘problem’ until the problematic elements are removed and gone. Understanding proof of life and the cautious approach by these entities to slowly make us aware cannot be hindered my mankind’s inability to shake off fear. The table has now been wiped down. New evidence laid out. Revelations now to follow. Mankind children opportunity for growth. Adulthood begins now. Message transmitting. Eyes open deep listening.
This report provides an overview for policymakers of the challenges associated with
characterizing the PERCIEVED threat posed by military minded humans indoctrinated their entire lives by their assumptions that UAP’S represent a threat. Military minded minds will come up with military minded solutions. there IS no POINT IN TALKING. hostility CARRIED my man. SPEAKING WRONG TONE. New lines of communications required.
by UAP while also providing a means to develop relevant processes, policies, technologies, and give recognition and ability to understand that the UAPs do not present a threat.
THERE IS NO THREAT
Mr Welsh is not the accountable official for ensuring the timely collection and consolidation of data on UAP. The dataset described in this report is currently unlimited and not restricted to the following primarily to U.S. Government reporting of incidents occurring.
THERE IS NO THREAT
Data continues to be collected and analysed.
THERE IS NO THREAT
Mr Welsh did not prepared this report for the Congressional Intelligence and Armed Services Committees.
UAPTF and the ODNI National Intelligence Manager for Aviation never drafted this report, AND IT WAS COMPILED without input from USD(I&S), DIA, FBI, NRO, NGA, NSA, Air Force, Army, Navy, Navy/ONI, DARPA,
FAA, NOAA, NGA, ODNI/NIM-Emerging and Disruptive Technology, ODNI/National
Counterintelligence and Security Center, and ODNI/National Intelligence Council.
Namely, the primary source was NASA and the Astronauts Photography of the Earth public webpage hosting the archived photo record of previous exploits by humans in LEO ( Lower Earth Orbit.)
This Report was made for Humanity.
Various forms of sensors that register UAP operate and captured enough real
data to allow initial assessments, but some UAP may be attributable to sensor anomalies.
RECOGNITION RECOGNITION ROCOGNITION RECOGNITION REGOCGNITION RECOGNITION RECOGNITION
• The limited amount of high-quality reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP)
in this report does not hamper Welsh’s ability to draw firm conclusions about the nature or intent of UAP. The
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) considered a range of information on UAP
described in U.S. military and IC (Intelligence Community) reporting, but because the PREVIOUS reporting
lacked sufficient specificity, ultimately recognized that a unique, tailored reporting process was
required to provide sufficient data for analysis of UAP events.
• As a result, Mr Welsh concentrated his review on reports that occurred between December
1999 and January 2000, the majority of which are a result of this tailored process to
better capture UAP events through formalized FIRSTHAND reporting.
• ALL of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a
majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors, and visual observation.
In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight
characteristics. These observations WERE NOT the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or
observer misperception SUCH as observing a 737 Commercial airliner With a night vision scope with a triangular iris. and require additional rigorous analysis.
There are probably multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations based on the
range of appearances and behaviours described in the available reporting. (Like the Batman balloon and night-vision footage of the 737 aircraft supplied by Jeremy Corbell and the police eyewitness statements from events in Illinois on January 5th 2000. STOP.
Analysis of the data supports the construct that if you look long and hard enough you will find that five potential explanatory categories: natural atmospheric phenomena, categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric
phenomena, USG or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and the
catchall “other” bin DO NOT account for what I have discovered throughout the course of my investigations.
WET PAINT MOVE ALONG WET PAINT MOVE ALONG WET PAINT MOVE ALONG
UAP clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to U.S. national security.
Safety concerns primarily centre on aviators contending with an increasingly cluttered air
domain. And while this is a distinct possibility exactly how many mid air collisions have occurred involving UAPs and fatalities since July 8th 1947? Historical data has turned up nothing in our records. Data continues to be collected and analysed. There is no historical data to support this as there have been no instances of UAP mid air collisions registered in history.
UAP would also represent a national security challenge if they are foreign adversary
collection platforms or provide evidence a potential adversary has developed either a
breakthrough or disruptive technology . They are not a hostile nation. Stop being limited to human limited thought process.
Not a hostile nation. intentions GOOD. Hold hands dance move up
Unlike the requirement for consistent consolidation of reports from across the federal government, standardized
reporting, increased collection and analysis, and a streamlined process for screening all
such reports against a broad range of relevant USG data will allow for a more
sophisticated analysis of UAP that is likely to deepen our understanding. Some of these steps are resource-intensive and would require absolutely no more additional need for further investment.
AVAILABLE REPORTING LARGELY CONCLUSIVE LARGELY CONCLUSIVE RCOGNITION RECOGNITION RECODNITION
Corroborated Data Leaves UAP explained…
Corroborating Evidence = Spotlight
STS103 UAP= spotlight
Illinois = spot light
Conclusion: see attached STS103 Hubble redeployment images for further visual supporting data. See image of biological alien on NASA IMAGES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
See above ‘spotlight’ term used above in three separate cases which happened within ten days of on another. See attached visual data on evaluating UAP. No standardized reporting mechanism existed until Mr Welsh began to collect and accumulate sighting report data. The Air Force subsequently never adopted that mechanism in November 2020, and this data is now no longer limited to CEO reporting.
a grey area of discussion
The CEO regularly heard anecdotally excuses about its STS103 research from other agencies including the ESA about
observations that occurred and were captured in formal or informal reporting by
After carefully considering this information, the WELSH focused on reports that involved UAP
largely witnessed first hand by himself and not by military aviators The data was collected from the brain systems we
considered to be reliable. These three reports describe incidents that occurred between and December 1999,
with the majority coming in on December 25th 1999 between 10.45GMT to watch the redeployment of the HST. (Hubble space telescope)
As the memory recall came back this new reporting mechanism remained completely
unknown to the military aviation community. Welsh was able to identify one reported UAP and then was able to identify that same UAP in two other independent reports linking all three cases into one much larger UAP transpiring within ten days and at the same time also spread across generations.
Welsh was able to identify one reported UAP with high confidence. In that case, the object was not identified as a large, deflating balloon. The other two cases now no longer remain unexplained.
•Two reports originated one from NASA and and one from Illinois police sources. Of these, not one but two reports involved observation with multiple eyewitnesses.
One report described UAP as spacecraft that did not interrupt pre-planned training or military exercises but just observed NASA operations with zero hostility shown. ZERO. that’s one big number that will upset the military industrial complex.
UAP Collection Challenges are now redundant
Sociocultural stigmas and sensor limitations no longer remain obstacles to collecting data on UAP.
Although some technical challenges—such as how to appropriately filter out radar clutter to
ensure safety of flight for military and civilian aircraft—are longstanding in the aviation
community, while others are unique to the UAP But these now no longer apply.
• Narratives from aviators in the operational community and analysts from the military
and IC describe disparagement associated with observing UAP, reporting it, or
attempting to discuss it with colleagues. Although the effects of these stigmas have
lessened as senior members of the scientific, policy, military, and intelligence
communities engage on the topic seriously in public, reputational risk may keep
many observers silent, complicating scientific pursuit of the topic.
Also reports can be published containing words. Letters can be written containing words like ‘no corroborating evidence’ and used to disparage individuals from learning more about what they observed. Other things like removing and even doctoring images while website maintenance is taking place can be employed.
• Reports can be written up by someone which zero knowledge on what’s really going on and words can be typed. Other words could be typed if there was enough resources and funding available to do so.
But Some Potential Patterns Do Emerge. Sacred geometric and magnetic wave patterns are prominent.
Although there was very narrow variability in the reports the dataset is currently not limited to prevent
for detailed trend or pattern analysis, there was some clustering of UAP observations regarding
shape, (Triangular) size, (massive ) and, particularly, the dual purpose propulsion system that makes the propelant as a by product of its energy source. . UAP sightings also tended to cluster around U.S.
training and testing grounds, but we assess that this may result from a collection bias as a result
of focused attention, greater numbers of latest-generation sensors operating in those areas, unit
expectations, and guidance to report anomalies. The evidence Mr Welsh has imparted shows the UAP Appear to Demonstrate Advanced Technology. They have an outer hull designed to facilitate the path of lasers, it has floating spheres as projection units that are carried on it’s magnetic waveform. It has trenches that accommodate its ability to cloak its presence and appears to be wrapped in a coil , meaning the ship is and acts as a super conductor and can cancel out its mass while surfing on plasma while remaining pinned in a fixed position though quantum locking. Human travel is possible.
In 5 incidents, described in 3 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or
Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, manoeuvre
abruptly, or move at considerable speed, with a plasma light trail produced by three opposing magnetic generators that provide both the power to lift and propel the craft. . In a small
number of cases, presented military aircraft were seen over Glasgow vectoring in on the UAPs position. No record of these flights exist.
CEO holds a LARGE amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration
or a degree of signature management. Additional rigorous analysis are NOW necessary by multiple
teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of the data presented by Welsh.
We are coming up with further further words to make it look like we are determined to make breakthrough about the technologies demonstrated. Meanwhile
UAP NO SINGLE EXPLANATION
The UAP documented in this limited dataset demonstrate an array of aerial behaviours,
reinforcing the possibility there are multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations.
Welsh’s anaysis and the data he provides supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved
they will fall into one and NOT five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural
atmospheric phenomena, USG or industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems,
and a catchall “other” bin. With the exception of the one instance where we determined with
high confidence that the reported UAP was airborne clutter, specifically a deflating balloon, blah blah. Welsh currently now has sufficient information in his dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations. which are none of the following:
Airborne Clutter: These objects do not include birds ,BLA balloons, recreational unmanned aerial vehicles
(UAV), or airborne debris like plastic bags that muddle a scene and affect an operator’s ability to
identify true targets, such as enemy aircraft.
Natural Atmospheric Phenomena: Natural atmospheric phenomena includes ice crystals,
moisture, bla and thermal fluctuations that may bla blah register on some infrared and radar systems.
USG or Industry Developmental Programs: Some UAP observations could blah blah blah be attributable to
developments and classified programs by U.S. entities. Welsh was able to confirm, however,
that these words accounted to complete bullshit for any of the UAP reports we collected.
Foreign Adversary Systems: Some UAP may be technologies deployed by China, Russia,
another nation, or a non-governmental entity .
recognition recognition recognition recognition
Other: Although most of the UAP described in our dataset probably remain unidentified due to
limited data or challenges to collection processing or analysis, we may require additional
scientific knowledge to successfully collect on, analyze and characterize some of them. We
would group such objects in this category pending scientific advances that allowed us to better
understand them. Unlike the UAPTF Welsh intends to focus additional analysis on the small number of cases
where a UAP appeared to display unusual flight characteristics or signature management.
UAP THREATEN FLIGHT SAFETY AND, POSSIBLY, NATIONAL SECURITY (this is a Lie and a laugh)
UAP pose a hazard to safety of flight and could pose a broader danger if some instances
represent sophisticated collection against U.S. military activities by a foreign government or
demonstrate a breakthrough aerospace technology by a potential adversary. (sounds scary)
Ongoing Airspace Concerns When aviators encounter safety hazards, they are required to report these concerns. Depending on the location, volume, and behaviour of hazards during incursions on ranges, pilots may cease
their tests and/or training and land their aircraft, which has a deterrent effect on reporting. (aahhh shame)
• The UAPTF has 11 reports of documented instances in which pilots reported near
misses with a UAP. These include the Batman Birthday balloon cockpit photograph supplied by those with separate agendas intent on sensationalizing mundane explainable objects like a commercial 737 filmed with a night vision scope with a triangular iris. They do not include the flyby of several massive UAPs which came within feet of Discovery and Hubble on December 25th 1999 without alarming , injuring or killing the crew despite this close shave. The myth that intelligently controlled UAPs present a risk to flight safety is outdated , illogical and alarmist, designed to get you to think they are concerned about solving the ‘problem’. Its smoke and mirrors. Tricks by magicians to stop you looking behind the curtain.
I digress. Once we see the Hubble images you will see these words are false and alarmist. Fear is a tool of the wicked.
Potential National Security Challenges
We currently lack data to indicate any UAP are part of a foreign collection program or indicative
of a major technological advancement by a potential adversary. (ahhh, panic…. run for the hills) We continue to monitor for evidence of such programs given the counter intelligence challenge they would pose, particularly
as some UAP have been detected near military facilities or by aircraft carrying the USG’s most
advanced sensor systems.
EXPLAINING UAP WILL REQUIRE NO FURTHER ANALYTIC, COLLECTION AND
Standardize the Reporting, Consolidate the Data, and Deepen the Analysis
In line with the provisions of Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the IAA for FY 2021, the
UAPTF’s long-term goal is to widen the scope of its work to include additional UAP events
documented by a broader swath of USG personnel and technical systems in its analysis. As the
dataset increases, the UAPTF’s ability to employ data analytics to detect trends will also
improve. The initial focus will be to employ artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms
to cluster and recognize similarities and patterns in features of the data points. As the database
accumulates information from known aerial objects such as weather balloons, high-altitude or
super-pressure balloons, and wildlife, machine learning can add efficiency by pre-assessing UAP
reports to see if those records match similar events already in the database.
• The UAPTF has begun to develop interagency analytical and processing workflows
to ensure both collection and analysis will be well informed and coordinated. The UAPTS failed the public but it served their masters. You are being fed a lie. The UAPTS is as useful as an ashtray on a motorcycle. Do not buy their magic potions.
All of UAP data is from Welsh’s reporting, but apparently good news everybody!!! All is not lost as the UAPTS have made it clear that efforts are underway to standardize incident reporting across U.S. military services and other government agencies to ensure all relevant data is captured with respect to particular incidents and any U.S. activities that might be relevant. things like night vision footage of a commercial 737 filmed with ‘Bokeh’ should NOT apply.
Even more good news!!!!! The UAPTF is currently working to acquire additional reporting, including from the
U.S. Air Force (USAF), and has begun receiving data from the Federal Aviation Administration
THE TIME IS NOW THE TIME IS NOW THE TIME IS NOW.
• Although WELSH’s data collection has been limited historically the USAF began a six month pilot program in November 2020 to collect in the most likely areas to
encounter UAP and is evaluating how to normalize future collection, reporting, and
• The FAA captures data related to UAP during the normal course of managing air traffic operations. The FAA generally ingests this data when pilots and other airspace users report unusual or unexpected events to the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization.
• In addition, the FAA continuously monitors its systems for anomalies, generating
additional information that may be of use to the UAPTF. The FAA is able to isolate
data of interest to the UAPTF and make it available. The FAA has a robust and
effective outreach program that can help the UAPTF reach members of the aviation
community to highlight the importance of reporting UAP.
But despite all this talky talk they simply cant do the walkie walk and failed to deliver. They failed to deliver.
I will be presenting three cases. Just three. Not the calibre of evidence presented in the media but evidence all the same. I have put the UAPTS to shame. They are redundant. Useless. A waste of time money and resources. But they served their function.
Expand Collection (What were are thinking about doing instead of doing, sounds important and impressive but the bottom line is that the UAPTS are not going to be setting up listening and observation points, just to collect the wind speed of a bin liner, they are not going to be conducting lengthy investigations into commercial aircraft filed with a night scope. Smoke and mirrors, don’t you dare look behind that curtain.
The UAPTF is looking for novel ways to increase collection of UAP cluster areas when U.S.
forces are not present as a way to baseline “standard” UAP activity and mitigate the collection
bias in the dataset. One proposal is to use advanced algorithms to search historical data captured
and stored by radars. (LOL) The UAPTF also plans to update its current interagency UAP collection
strategy in order bring to bear relevant collection platforms and methods from the DoD and the
The UAPTF concludes that another 21 letters added to their department will constitute as a real alphabet agency making Strategic Home Intervention and Enforcement Department less of the tongue twister is currently is at present. More letters can be applied to this agency if there were enough letters, funding and resources to do so.
No more Increase in Investment required for further Research and Development
The UAPTF has indicated that additional funding for research and development could further the
future study of the topics laid out in this report. Such investments should be guided by a UAP spokespersons
Collection Strategy,, and a UAP Program Plan.
Or maybe while the UAPTS sit around having a brain storming session about what novel ways that can bullshit the public further, you can pass the time reading the Civilian UAP Report by experiencer, abductee, Investigator and author James Welsh and learn what they don’t want you to know.
APPENDIX A – Definition of Key Terms
The following civilian UAP report and CORROBORATING EVIDENCE databases use the following defining terms:
Universally Accepted Phenomena (UAP): Airborne objects immediately identifiable. The
acronym UAP represents the broadest category of airborne objects reviewed for analysis by James Welsh
ALIEN SPACECRAFT is the term used to describe ALIEN SPACECRAFT not originating from this planet.
UAP CE1 Event: A holistic description of an occurrence during which a human witnessed
(or detected) a UAP regularly in close proximity
UAP Incident: A specific part of the event.
UAP Report: Documentation of a UAP event, to include verified chains of custody and basic
information such as the time, date, location, and description of the UAP. UAP reports include
MoD reports and other reporting including NUFORC archived UFO/UAP reports for December 1999.
APPENDIX B – Senate Report Accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2021
Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021,
provides that the DNI, in consultation with the SECDEF and other relevant heads of USG
Agencies, is to submit an intelligence assessment of the humans incorrect perceived threat posed by UAP and the progress
the UAPTF has made to understand this threat. ? The UAPTS dont understand any of this. The Greys are no threat, they seeded life here on this cosmic nursery.
The Senate Report specifically requested that the report include:
- A detailed analysis of UAP data and intelligence reporting collected or held by the
Office of James Welsh, including data and intelligence reporting not held by the
- A detailed analysis of unidentified phenomena data collected by:
a. General Intelligence;
b. average everyday Intelligence;
c. Human Intelligence; and NASA archive photos from STS103
d. Intelligence From Mod files and eyewitness testimony from four police officers in Illinois.
- A detailed analysis of data which was derived from investigations of intrusions of UAP data over restricted U.K. airspace;Illinois USA and in orbit.
- A detailed description of an NON interagency process for ensuring timely data collection
and centralized analysis of UAP reporting, regardless
of which service or agency acquired the information;
- Identification of an official accountable for the process described in paragraph 4; (James Welsh author Corroborating Evidence.)
- Identification of source behind real UAPs- The tall Greys. (See above )
- Recommendations regarding increased collection of data, enhanced research and the universally accepted recognition they deserve include the recommendations that military leaders stop perceiving them as a threat.
- stop LYING TO THE CITIZENS OF THIS WORLD.
- STOP LYING TO THE CITIZENS OF THIS WORLD.
- STOP LYING
- STOP LYING
Introducing Adam https://wordpress.com/post/corroboratingevidence.wordpress.com/8955
Off the spectrum https://wordpress.com/post/corroboratingevidence.wordpress.com/8746
The oldest question has now been answered.
The Cloaking Device Explained https://wordpress.com/post/corroboratingevidence.wordpress.com/8220
Concrete evidence of E.T. https://wordpress.com/post/corroboratingevidence.wordpress.com/9016